Your reporting, reconciliation and control work still runs on spreadsheets and manual checks.

Agents doing the work in your operation.

For CFOs, COOs and heads of finance or operations whose reporting, reconciliation and control work still runs through spreadsheets and manual checks.

Assess Agentic ReadinessSee what three weeks include

Does this sound familiar?

Somewhere in your operation there is a job that comes round every month, quarter or year: the board pack, the rent indexation, the service charge reconciliation. The figures come out of three systems that do not agree, so somebody exports them, reconciles them by hand, and pastes the result into a spreadsheet nobody else dares touch.

Last year you funded an AI pilot to fix exactly this. It demoed well, then went quiet. The data underneath turned out to be the problem, and nobody said so until the budget was gone.

Now a vendor is promising agents, and you have no way of knowing whether your systems can carry one before you sign.

  • The same reconciliation is done by hand every month, by the same senior people.
  • Your last AI pilot ended as a demo, and nobody could say why.
  • Vendors promise agents. None has shown you one working on your data.
  • You cannot tell whether your data is good enough until a build has already started.
  • The board asks what the AI budget returned, and there is no baseline to answer with.

If you want the manual work gone for good, the agents have to run in production, not just demos.

That means agents that read your source systems, reconcile the figures and prepare the work your team approves, inside guardrails that earn trust in stages, with every action logged. Here is what that gives you.

  • Reporting, reconciliation and control work that no longer depends on a spreadsheet and the one person who knows how it works
  • Every figure that reaches the board or the regulator comes with a record of where it came from and who approved it
  • Outcomes the board can steer on, measured every month

The path from here

You commit one stage at a time. Each stage leaves you something you can use whether or not you go on, and nothing ties you to a platform we recommend. First agents live within 3 months, then a 12 to 24 month term underneath them.

  1. Agentic Readiness Start hereThree weeks. One working agent on your own data, or the reason there is not one yet.
  2. Agent Development6 to 12 weeks. Two or three production agents, reporting first.
  3. Managed ServicesWe run it under a 12 to 24 month term, if your team does not have the capacity.

Assess Agentic Readiness

One working agent on your own data in three weeks, with a fixed price for the build. Or start with a 30-minute working session.

Independent. We recommend what works, not what we sell.

One reply, within a working day, from the person who would lead the engagement.

Rather talk it through first? Book a 30-minute introduction call

What we have done in real estate

Three engagements, one for each step of the ladder, and what each one settled.

  • Agentic Readiness, for a European property software vendor

    Every new client was configured by hand, from knowledge in consultants' heads. In a few weeks we built a working agent against their live platform, using standards derived from their own past implementations. Their consultants judged the standard and output good enough to take over much of the work. They left with the agent, the evidence, and a rollout plan.

  • Architecture Assessment, for a pan-European real estate organisation

    A core platform was about to be chosen with no picture of what it had to fit into. We designed the target architecture first, then scanned the market against it: an independent shortlist with a cost range per option, where quotes for the same scope differed by a factor of three. The board got a shortlist it could defend and the figures behind its business case.

  • Agent Development, for a proptech platform

    Tenant and back-office agents on a live portfolio, connected to the property management and service ticket systems. Answers are benchmarked before release and monitored after, each agent sees only what the person asking may see, and GDPR and the AI Act are designed in. Tenants get answers at any hour; the team gets the exceptions and a record of every action.

Three starting points, one discipline: prove the output on real data before building the plumbing, keep what the existing systems can carry, and the same people from first session to handover.

Based in the Netherlands and built for European enterprises: data sovereignty, GDPR and AI Act compliance from day one.